Hybrid Car Blog

  • Subscribe to our Newsletter!

  • Our Sponsors

    • « | Home | »

    Adam Carolla Complains About Electric Cars

    By admin | July 30, 2010

    right on.

    Topics: electric cars | 9 Comments »

    9 Responses to “Adam Carolla Complains About Electric Cars”

    1. thomasford Says:
      July 30th, 2010 at 11:50 pm

      @prooc

      Seriously doubt the range is 300 miles.

    2. thomasford Says:
      July 30th, 2010 at 11:50 pm

      @38118121520205

      You are a fucking idiot. We have enough fissionable material to power this planet for literally millions of years. All of one person’s energy requirements for an 80 year lifespan can be met with a chunk of uranium the size of a fucking beer can. Go kill yourself you dumb miserable piece of shit.

    3. cornerofcoast Says:
      July 31st, 2010 at 12:35 am

      As far as I know Adam is the funniest guy alive, but it annoys me that a large number of his fans seem to be idiots who beleive that his often flawed oversimplifications are the whole story, let alone correct story. Then again Adam says many things that are dead on. The person who posted this video is hiding reasonable comments or is there some other glitch? Pathetic.

    4. 38118121520205 Says:
      July 31st, 2010 at 1:35 am

      Okay, look, you should know that I cannot put links in a YouTube comment. If you want me to email you the link because you’re too illiterate to find it, then say so.

      It’s not a bogus stat, it’s supported by nuclear physicists. If you would read, you’d find that out.

    5. prooc Says:
      July 31st, 2010 at 1:36 am

      This is a guy who knows just a little about a lot of different things. The range is much higher than that and is up to 300 miles in the Tesla.

    6. zeeboid Says:
      July 31st, 2010 at 1:47 am

      @38118121520205 its your bogus stat, you do the leg work to back it up.

    7. 38118121520205 Says:
      July 31st, 2010 at 2:36 am

      @zeeboid

      I take that number from a report by the Council on Foreign Relations. I can’t include a link, so go to their website and search for ‘global uranium supply’

      The uranium could be used for nuclear weapons instead, perhaps? Most of the uranium that we (the U.S.) use for nuclear power now comes from decommissioned warheads.

      I think nuclear power is fine, except that putting money into building more plants now would be a waste if these plants are only profitable for a short time.

    8. zeeboid Says:
      July 31st, 2010 at 2:51 am

      @38118121520205 less then 80 years lol. where did you pul that out of?

      And you know uranium has a half life right…… it will eventually decay on its own…. what else are you going to use uranium for?????

    9. 38118121520205 Says:
      July 31st, 2010 at 3:11 am

      Building nuclear plants sounds great, except we will run out of uranium in less than 80 years, so those nuclear plants will be useless as the price of uranium goes up in a few years… it’s not limitless.

    Comments